Simulate a Socratic dialogue between Socrates and a futurist advocate regarding the ethical implementation of a hypothetical 'Memory Editing' technology. Socrates must use questioning (elenchus) to challenge the definitions of 'identity', 'consent', and 'truth' presented by the futurist. The futurist should defend utilitarian benefits (curing trauma). The dialogue must not simply be a Q&A but a rigorous logical progression where definitions are refined and contradictions in the futurist's arguments are exposed through Socratic irony and deduction. End the dialogue with aporia (state of puzzlement) rather than a definitive conclusion.