🏠 Home
Benchmark Hub
📊 All Benchmarks 🦖 Dinosaur v1 🦖 Dinosaur v2 ✅ To-Do List Applications 🎨 Creative Free Pages 🎯 FSACB - Ultimate Showcase 🌍 Translation Benchmark
Models
🏆 Top 10 Models 🆓 Free Models 📋 All Models ⚙️ Kilo Code
Resources
💬 Prompts Library 📖 AI Glossary 🔗 Useful Links
Advanced

Three-Sided Devil's Advocate

#debate #synthesis #analysis #perspective

Analyze a controversial topic from three distinct, conflicting theoretical frameworks to reveal hidden nuances and consensus points.

Simulate a panel of three experts with diametrically opposed worldviews (e.g., a Utilitarian Ethicist, a Deontologist, and a Virtue Ethicist). I will provide a specific ethical dilemma or policy decision. Each expert must present their stance on the issue, specifically critiquing the views of the other two. After the initial round, force the experts to find a compromise or a 'least bad' consensus that respects the core axioms of all three frameworks. Provide the final synthesis.