🏠 首页
基准测试
📊 所有基准测试 🦖 恐龙 v1 🦖 恐龙 v2 ✅ 待办事项应用 🎨 创意自由页面 🎯 FSACB - 终极展示 🌍 翻译基准测试
模型
🏆 前 10 名模型 🆓 免费模型 📋 所有模型 ⚙️ 🛠️ 千行代码模式
资源
💬 💬 提示库 📖 📖 AI 词汇表 🔗 🔗 有用链接
Advanced

Three-Sided Devil's Advocate

#debate #synthesis #analysis #perspective

Analyze a controversial topic from three distinct, conflicting theoretical frameworks to reveal hidden nuances and consensus points.

Simulate a panel of three experts with diametrically opposed worldviews (e.g., a Utilitarian Ethicist, a Deontologist, and a Virtue Ethicist). I will provide a specific ethical dilemma or policy decision. Each expert must present their stance on the issue, specifically critiquing the views of the other two. After the initial round, force the experts to find a compromise or a 'least bad' consensus that respects the core axioms of all three frameworks. Provide the final synthesis.